FEI President Refuses to follow the FEI code of ethics and be Transparent over Alleged Corruption Claims

PRESS RELEASE

– 15 July 2018 –

An ongoing investigation into the testing of new equipment and further false claims made on the 4 November 2017 from the Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI) involved in an alleged cover up has angered the Equestrian community and the media.

The FEI has refused to honour the FEI constitution and code of ethics and be transparent by supplying the 2014 and the alleged 2016 WTP NP bit testing reports. After assessing the evidence in this matter the media and equestrian community made the following comments:

“this smacks of corruption”
“So sad to know what your up against corruption”
“If you ask me the whole regulation system for equipment and tack needs a big overhaul, especially considering the lack of an evidence-based, and transparent process as you have experienced”
“This is disgraceful and if they won’t supply the reports it stinks of corruption and the President should be sacked.”

Further the FEI, ECIU “Equestrian Community Integrity Unit” which was formed following the 2008 FEI scandal whereby all members of the FEI Dressage committee were asked to resign immediately. We have a phone recording conversation with the ECIU who has criticised the FEI. They stated, “you do get some funny attitudes from FEI people” “By reading all the expert reports they should be approved and on the face of it, the WTP bit is a good piece of equipment and I can’t understand why they would not approve it” Further the ECIU requested the WTP NP bit testing reports but has never received them. Following the FEI 2008 scandal the FEI stated transparency cannot be compromised, however, based on recent FEI correspondence it is evident there is still serious transparency and ethical issues within the FEI.

The FEI has had many opportunities to provide the 2014 WTP NP bit and the alleged 2016 FEI testing reports. We wrote the following to FEI President Mr. Ingmar De Vos and other high-ranking officials. “No one can fathom why you have taken such a stance against what is rated one of the kindest bits in the world other than corruption is involved. If you believe there is no corruption, please provide the reason why you have refused to supply the WTP NP testing reports. If you intend to claim there is no corruption, please provide any other reason why the previous director of the FEI dressage department Ms. Carina Mayer made her false and deceptive claims” Please note the FEI has not been able to supply any other reason. The FEI Code of Ethics states all members provide information that is accurate, complete, objective and in a timely fashion. As such, the 2014 and 2016 testing panel reports should have been provided upon request.

FEI President Refuses to be Transparent over Alleged Corruption Claims

An ongoing investigation into the testing of new equipment and the recent article below regarding the Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI) involved in an alleged cover up has angered the Equestrian community and the media. This was due to the FEI refusing to honour the FEI constitution and code of ethics and be transparent by supplying the 2014 and the alleged 2016 WTP NP bit testing reports. After assessing the evidence in this matter the media and equestrian community made the following comments …“this smacks of corruption”… “So sad to know what your up against corruption”… “If you ask me the whole regulation system for equipment and tack needs a big overhaul, especially considering the lack of an evidence-based, and transparent process as you have experienced”… “This is disgraceful and if they won’t supply the reports it stinks of corruption and the President should be sacked” Further the FEI, ECIU “Equestrian Community Integrity Unit” which was formed following the 2008 FEI scandal whereby all members of the FEI Dressage committee were asked to resign immediately. We have a phone recording conversation with the ECIU who has criticised the FEI. They stated, “you do get some funny attitudes from FEI people” “By reading all the expert reports they should be approved and on the face of it, the WTP bit is a good piece of equipment and I can’t understand why they would not approve it” Further the ECIU requested the WTP NP bit testing reports but has never received them. Following the FEI 2008 scandal the FEI stated transparency cannot be compromised, however, based on recent FEI correspondence it is evident there is still serious transparency and ethical issues within the FEI.

The FEI has had many opportunities to provide the 2014 WTP NP bit and the alleged 2016 FEI testing reports. We wrote the following to FEI President Mr. Ingmar De Vos and other high-ranking officials. “No one can fathom why you have taken such a stance against what is rated one of the kindest bits in the world other than corruption is involved. If you believe there is no corruption, please provide the reason why you have refused to supply the WTP NP testing reports. If you intend to claim there is no corruption, please provide any other reason why the previous director of the FEI dressage department Ms. Carina Mayer made her false and deceptive claims” Please note the FEI has not been able to supply any other reason. The FEI Code of Ethics states all members provide information that is accurate, complete, objective and in a timely fashion. As such, the 2014 and 2016 testing panel reports should have been provided upon request.

READ MORE

As mentioned by the equestrian community “If you ask me the whole regulation system for equipment and tack needs a big overhaul, especially considering the lack of an evidence-based, and transparent process as you have experienced”

There have been suggestions from the media and equestrian community that an overhaul is necessary, and this should be raised, discussed and considered at the November 2017 FEI general assembly by the National Federation members to prevent further scandals. Furthermore, there need to be changes following the testing procedures, whereby all National Federations and equipment companies should be supplied with copies of the testing panel reports immediately after testing is finalised to prevent outside commercial influence and possible corruption within the FEI. Further this is also an opportunity for the National Federations to ask the FEI to provide you with the 2014 and 2016 WTP NP bit reports, which will expose the truth and support the reason for changes.

Furthermore, there are suggestions that there should be two or three independent court judges active or retired overseeing the appeal process and integrity unit. Therefore, allowing the equestrian community or the National Federations to request the judges to review their cases. As indicated when the FEI will not provide the crucial evidence to be used for an appeal and when the FEI refuses to provide the testing reports to the integrity unit the FEI cannot be trusted and why they are being called corrupt. If independent court judges were in place the FEI members would know they can be held accountable, and this could help prevent FEI members abusing their powers and influencing others, which could cause further scandals. National Federations should call for these necessary changes which will make them feel more confident of a fair and truthful process and not having to fear that their FEI Membership would be cancelled if they challenged the FEI over issues or rules. We feel very confident if this was in place the judges would have demanded the FEI to provide the 2014 WTP NP bit testing panel reports and the alleged 2016 testing reports. We are also confident they would agree with the media and equestrian community assessment and comments and would call for the WTP NP bit to be approved immediately. The conduct during this matter by some high-ranking FEI members has proven to be unethical, and we again call for the FEI to honour its constitution and be transparent and provide the WTP NP bit testing reports.

Further, we will refer to media comments in support of the WTP NP bit case, which state: “If the FEI supplied the testing reports this matter could have been resolved a long time ago. The suggestion of re-testing is a farcical attempt to cover up this scandal and that all the FEI claims regarding the WTP NP Bit were based on deception and lies to mislead the National Federations and the Equestrian community, which challenges the ethics, integrity and reputation of the FEI. The alleged FEI testing of the WTP NP Bit was not conducted in 2016 and members of the Dressage Department Carina Mayer, Anna Milne, Bettina De Rhams, President Mr Ingmar De Vos, Secretary General Sabrina Ibáñez, Director of the Dressage Committee Mr Frank Kemperman and Legal Director Mikael Rentsch were aware of this, and that all FEI claims were false and misleading and, therefore, the WTP NP Bit should have been approved in 2014.” – Equine News. The FEI offer for re-testing as stated by the media and others is farcical and an attempt to nullify all previous reports to prevent us from publicising the truth. We again refer to the correspondence with FEI Dressage committee director Mr. Frank Kemperman, who could not find a reason for further re-testing. Furthermore, we had asked the FEI several times for a reason, and they could not find one, and neither could the 2014 FEI testing panel and all the other experts who have tested the WTP NP bits for years. Further the FEI has never challenged the 2014 FEI testing panels conduct they have just refused to supply us and the media the reports which would expose the truth and Ms. Carina Mayer’s false claims lies and deception.

Because of this ongoing investigation and further information, it is apparent that other equipment companies have encountered similar problems regarding FEI testing or non-testing of their equipment, stating they have also been misled and deceived.

Media and other Enquiries and the expert reports.
Contact Mr. Adrian Morgante
WTP Bit Company
Email: admin@iiwinners.com

 

Print Friendly and PDF

Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI) Involved in Alleged Cover Up

PRESS RELEASE

An ongoing investigation into the testing of new equipment by the Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI) has raised grave concerns regarding issues of non-transparency, dishonesty and unethical misconduct by several of its members.

A committee responsible for safeguarding the best interests of horses, the mishandled testing of new equipment, designed for their benefit and welfare, not only jeopardises commercial interests, but places the welfare of horses at risk.

Mr Adrian Morgante of the WTP Bit Company, owner and developer of the WTP NP Bit, has encountered repeated resistance by the FEI in the public release of testing panel reports from 2014 and 2016 for the past 12 months.

“Under the FEI Constitution and rules of procedure when applying for new equipment to be tested for FEI approval, two to three members of the authorised testing panel must test the equipment under riding.”

“These authorised testing panel members must then fill out and sign a specific testing document, which outlines their comments and confirms whether the equipment has been approved or not approved.

“The FEI then notify the National Federations on the equipment that has been approved. However, based on the evidence and correspondence between the FEI and the WTP Bit Company in the case of the WTP NP Bit, we believe the National Federations and equestrian community have been lied to.

“It has become apparent the WTP NP Bit was approved by the 2014 testing panel. Further, the WTP NP Bit has been thoroughly tested by many experts, including high profile Dressage and Olympic riders, instructors, coaches, professors and lecturers in equine science, veterinarians, dental technicians and National Federation leaders. The WTP NP Bit contributes towards the welfare and happiness of the horse, as indicated in their attached expert reports.”

Enclosed is correspondence from many experts who’ve personally tested the WTP NP Bit over the years and many more can be provided upon request:

1) Judy Fasher, Chairman of Equestrian Australia
2) Angela McLeod; Equine Veterinarian
3) Dr Andrew McLean; Australian Equine Behaviour Centre
4) Caroline Wagner; Grand Prix Dressage Rider
5) Norm Glenn; Advanced Equine Muscle Therapy
6) Dr Lesley Hawson; BSc, BVSc, PhD, Associate of the Australian Equine Behaviour Centre and Lecturer in Equine Studies
7) Debbie Warne; FEI Dressage Rider, Equestrian Australia Dressage Judge, NCAS Level 1 General and Pony Club
8) Professor Paul McGreevy; University of Sydney
9) Bo Hehna; Dressage International 4* Judge and Coach for Swedish Dressage Team
10) Julia Lundh; Member of Swedish Equestrian Vaulting Team
11) Kerstin Andre; Dressage A Trainer, Sweden
12) Paulinda Friberg; Member of Swedish Dressage A Team
13) Malin Feldt; Competitor
14) Megan Williams; NQV Level 1, 2 and 3 Equine Management
15) Bernie Traurig; Show Jumping, Hunter, Equitation, Dressage, Eventing and Team Representative for the United States of America
16) Deb McKay, DVM
17) Jose Mendez, International Grand Prix Competitor, Accredited NCAS Dressage Level 2 Coach and FISRB Level 3 Official Coach
18) Julianna Matthews; NCAS Level 1 Coach
19) Kathy Ordynski; Competitor
20) Lea Bierman; NCAS Level 3 Dressage Specialist Coach, Educator and Judge
21) Grant Stuart; Competitor, New Zealand
22) Genevieve Denize; Competitor, New Zealand
23) Peter Jenkins; Equine Dental Technician
24) Chad Cunningham; Accredited FEI Level 1 and Level 2 Coach
25) Helena Hugoson Feldt; Veterinarian and Breeder of Show Jumping Horses
26) Anita Burke Equine Veterinarian BSc BVMS (Hons)

“The WTP NP Bit was tested in 2014, and the WTP Bit Company was informed by the FEI the WTP NP Bit was not approved because the centre piece was too large. However, the FEI did not provide the testing reports confirming their claim. That objection was also proven to be false and incorrect, and later withdrawn by the FEI.

“Further, to our knowledge, this objection was not mentioned in the 2014 testing panel reports, and we allege it was a personal view and agenda of Ms Carina Mayer to not approve the WTP NP Bit.

“Following this, Ms Carina Mayer, former FEI Dressage Director, claimed the WTP NP Bit could not be approved because the arms of the bit were blocked and this objection had previously been communicated to the WTP Bit Company.

“However, when requested by the WTP Bit Company, Ms Mayer was unable to provide any evidence of correspondence indicating this objection to be true and previously communicated to the WTP Bit Company.

“Although the WTP Bit Company provided indisputable evidence to the FEI of other Myler bits with the same function, Ms Mayer stated she was going to have the testing panel re-test the WTP NP Bit in 2016. But, subsequently, her personal objection was withdrawn when her claim was proven to be false and incorrect, which is why the FEI relies on a qualified testing panel.

“However, despite this, Ms Mayer stated the 2016 testing panel re-tested the WTP NP Bit and said it could not be approved because of the function of the bit. The WTP Bit Company again provided indisputable evidence proving this claim to be false and incorrect.

“In response to this, Ms Mayer stated the decision was final, and she would not correspond with the WTP Bit Company any further. Later, Ms Mayer changed her position, stating we could appeal but when asked to provide the evidence the WTP NP bit 2014 and 2016 testing panel reports, she ignored our requests.

“Furthermore, it has since become apparent no testing was conducted in 2016 and, therefore, any fabricated decision was invalid, and Ms Mayer’s false claims were based on lies and deception.”

Despite numerous requests by the WTP Bit Company over the past 12 months to receive copies of the 2014 and 2016 testing panel reports in an effort to resolve this matter, the FEI has continued to breach its own code of ethics by failing to provide them. The FEI Code of Ethics states all members provide information that is accurate, complete, objective and in a timely fashion. As such, the 2014 and 2016 testing panel reports should be provided upon request.

“After our correspondence with Ms Mayer, the WTP Bit Company and members of the equestrian community and media contacted FEI President Mr Ingmar De Vos and other FEI officials requesting copies of the 2014 and 2016 testing panel reports as a matter of transparency, which were also ignored.

“We have reason to believe the WTP NP Bit was approved by the 2014 testing panel, and the 2014 testing panel reports would indicate that and therefore, all following correspondence from the FEI has been based on false claims, and deception.

“It has also become obvious the WTP NP Bit was not re-tested in 2016 and based on the evidence we allege FEI officials, such as Ms Carina Mayer and Ms Anna Milne, abused their position — and it was their personal agenda and unqualified claims which gave rise to outside commercial influence and corruption. Both were given the opportunity to deny these claims, but they could not. Therefore, be omitting the claims to be true. Further we have emailed correspondence confirming it was their personal view and not that of the FEI authorized testing panel.

“How many other pieces of equipment have been approved or not approved, based on personal interests? How many other individual FEI officials have abused their position to lie to equipment companies, national federations and the equestrian community? Following further investigations, we are now aware of other equipment companies who have encountered similar problems regarding testing or non-testing of their equipment. These companies were not aware of the FEI testing rules of procedures. Therefore, they were easily misled by FEI members who abused their position and breached the FEI constitution and their rules of procedure for testing of new equipment.

“The WTP Bit Company and the media who has supported the WTP Bit company remain frustrated by continuous delays and lack of transparency imposed by the FEI. The FEI have yet to provide the crucial evidence — namely the 2014 and the alleged 2016 testing panel reports — which will prove the WTP NP Bit was indeed approved in 2014 by the FEI testing panel.”

Further we refer to the FEI letter, dated 14 December 2016, whereby the FEI stated:

“The rationale behind the decision of the Dressage working group for equipment and their decision on the 5th July 2016.”

However, this statement is considered a false claim as the FEI failed to provide the 2014 testing reports and the alleged 2016 testing reports to the WTP Bit company in an alleged attempt to cover up what has transpired. Further, we will refer to media comments in support of the WTP NP bit case, which state:

“That all of the FEI claims regarding the WTP NP Bit were based on deception and lies to mislead the National Federations and the Equestrian community, which challenges the ethics, integrity and reputation of the FEI. The alleged FEI testing of the WTP NP Bit was not conducted in 2016 and members of the Dressage Department Carina Mayer, Anna Milne, Bettina De Rhams, President Mr Ingmar De Vos, Secretary General Sabrina Ibáñez, Director of the Dressage Committee Mr Frank Kemperman and Legal Director Mikael Rentsch were aware of this, and that all FEI claims were false and misleading and, therefore, the WTP NP Bit should have been approved in 2014.” – Equine News

As a result of this ongoing investigation, the WTP Bit Company is calling for changes following the testing procedures, whereby all National Federations and equipment companies should be supplied with copies of the testing panel reports immediately after testing is finalised to prevent further scandals and possible corruption within the FEI. During this case, the FEI was asked several times to provide a reason why they have not supplied our testing reports, and they could not supply a reason. Therefore, as a matter of transparency, these testing procedure changes should be raised, discussed and considered at the November 2017 FEI general assembly by the National Federation members. Further this is also an opportunity to ask the FEI to provide you with the 2014 and 2016 WTP NP bit reports, which will support the reason for changes. In addition, it will corroborate the media comments that the FEI offer for re-testing was farcical and an attempt to cover up what had transpired. Further the handling of this case could give rise to National Federations questioning the FEI’s decisions in previous and pending negotiations and complaints.

Further we refer to the FEI 2008 case and scandal whereby the Dressage Committee were forced to resign immediately. Princess Haya who was President at the time was applauded for her strong stance against her colleagues the FEI Dressage Committee members demanding their immediate resignation. President Haya took this action to uphold and honour the FEI constitution as she would not tolerate any unethical conduct, arrogance, lies, deception and attempted cover-up.

Following this scandal, the FEI stated transparency was paramount and could not be compromised. However, the FEI has refused to provide crucial evidence for the WTP bit case and therefore, admitting there is still a serious transparency problem within the FEI and clear violations of FEI Constitutional standards, ethics, transparency and integrity.

Attached is a letter, dated June 21st, 2017, which outlines the alleged cover up by leading FEI officials.

“National Federations and the equestrian community are bound by strict rules and transparency standards, and we should expect no less from the FEI. The FEI must now provide the 2014 and 2016 testing panel reports, which will expose the truth in this matter.”

In the interest of horse welfare and transparency, please forward this to your club members, friends and media contacts and add it to your Facebook. We urge you and the media to call on the FEI to be transparent and provide the 2014 and the alleged 2016 testing reports which will disprove their unfounded claims and reveal the truth that the WTP NP bit was indeed approved by the 2014 FEI testing panel.

Media and other Enquiries
Contact Mr Adrian Morgante
WTP Bit Company
Email: admin@iiwinners.com

Notes: The following information and documents can be provided on request.

Expert Reports

The WTP NP Bit has been thoroughly tested by many experts, including high profile Dressage and Olympic riders, instructors, coaches, professors and lecturers in equine science, veterinarians, dental technicians and National Federation leaders. Their full expert reports can be provided on request.

Media Support

The following media has contacted the FEI in support of the WTP Bit Company and this ongoing investigation, and to request copies of the 2014 and 2016 testing panel reports, which have continued to be ignored. As the media stated, the FEI has been given many opportunities to supply the requested documents, which would have resolved this matter.

  • Equine News
  • Australian Performance Horse Magazine

Their letters to the FEI are included in this documentation.

Re-Testing

In response to the media contacting them, the FEI offered the WTP Bit Company to submit the WTP NP Bit for re-testing. However, had the WTP Bit Company agreed to this; it would nullify all previous testing panel reports, and further prevent the WTP Bit Company and the media from receiving the 2014 and 2016 testing panel reports, which will confirm there is no need for additional testing. Further the WTP bit company asked the FEI several times to supply a reason for further testing. However, the FEI could not give a reason. Furthermore, based on email correspondence if we agreed to their offer, the FEI had no intentions to supply any re-testing reports.

As mentioned by the media, this was a farcical attempt by the FEI to cover up the false claims, lies and deception. Attached is a letter, dated June 21st, 2017, which gave the FEI another opportunity to resolve this matter. However, they have not been able to deny their false claims.

Further, to our letter, dated August 22nd, 2016, and addressed to Mr Frank Kemperman, Director of the FEI Dressage Committee, which gave the FEI another opportunity to review all the documentation and supply the evidence. The letter mentioned:

“Should there still be objections to the continuation of the approval procedure, the WTP Bit Company asks the FEI to provide the reason why the WTP NP Bit cannot be approved in response to the content in our letter dated July 19th, 2016.”

However, the FEI were not able to provide further objections to the WTP NP Bit. Therefore, no further testing is required. It has become apparent the FEI testing panel reports of 2014 recommended the WTP NP Bit for approval and the FEI has not provided any evidence to prove otherwise.

Therefore, all following claims, such as the large centre piece, blocked arms and function of the WTP NP Bit, were false and misleading, and we can only conclude the invitation for re-testing, made by the FEI, had no reasoning but to conceal what has transpired.

Attached Letters: The following documents can be provided on request.

  • Media – Equine News comments and letters sent to the FEI.
  • Media – APH Australian Performance Horse comments and letters sent to the FEI.
  • International Expert Reports
  • WTP Bit Company letter to the FEI, dated June 21st, 2017 which outlines the alleged cover up by leading FEI officials.

Print Friendly and PDF